<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> <!-- Showbiz Portal Bottom 1 300x250, created 10/15/10 --> <ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:inline-block;width:300px;height:250px" data-ad-client="ca-pub-1272644781333770" data-ad-slot="2530175011"></ins> <script> (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); </script>
Mario Bautista, has been with the entertainment industry for more than 4 decades. He writes regular columns for People's Journal and Malaya.

Feb 19, 2012

The Woman In Black Movie Review: Disappointing Horror Flick Starring Harry Potter

“THE WOMAN in Black” is the second longest running play in London that started in 1987, based on a novel by Susan Hill published in 1983. The play has only two performers, the one playing the lead role, Arthur, and the other one doing all the other roles. Of course, they have to make changes for the film version so it won’t appear as just a filmed play. They also created a more complex story for Arthur. The play ends with him marrying his girl. Here, he is a young widower with a son.

Set at the turn of the 20th century, Arthur is a young lawyer sent by his boss to a distant village settle the estate of the late Alice Drablow, the Eel Marsh House. The villagers are hostile and want him to leave right away. One look at the cavernous mansion and you’ll know it’s haunted. He sees the woman in black, who wants to kill all the children in the village, and tries to find out what her secret is.

The best thing about the movie is the production design, with the beautiful Victorian period setting, especially the superbly photographed island where the house is located, connected to the mainland by a flimsy road that vanishes when the tide comes in. There are also beautiful shots of the marsh, the moors and the foggy valleys to foster the right eerie mood.

We came prepared to like the movie that we’re hoping would be the right vehicle for Radcliffe to dissociate himself from being Harry Potter. But it rambles on and on with nothing much happening and Radcliffe is not at all credible as a grieving widower and doting dad. After a while, Director James Baxter resorts to the usual tricks of creating boo moments meant to jolt the audience through amplified sound, like when muddy water suddenly blasts out of the faucet and a black bird suddenly flies into a room. Then we see apparitions moving around, the woman in black standing ominously in the distance or floating around or screaming. It becomes repetitive and everything becomes cumbersome viewing. If you love a good more cerebral scary story, this tedious exercise is definitely not for you.

POST